How Much Money Do People Pay For Drug Testing
According to the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 66 percent of substance abusers aged 18 and over are employed. With this knowledge at hand, one would assume that a vast majority of employers employ employee drug screening.
Surprisingly, more than 40 percent of employers practice not acquit pre-employment drug testing, and 64 percent of employers do non drug test current employees, according to the 2011 Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Drug Testing Efficacy Poll. The SHRM poll surveyed more than than i,000 Hour professionals in public, private and not-turn a profit organizations representing a variety of industries about their drug screening practices.
Why Practice Organizations Overlook Drug Testing?
The organizations that practise non conduct employee drug screening cited diverse reasons in the SHRM poll. Twenty-4 percent said that their organization does not believe in drug testing and 18 percent said that drug testing was not required past the state they operated in.
Sixteen percent said there was no viable return on investment for drug testing and another 16 per centum said that drug testing was too costly.
A smaller margin of respondents claimed that drug testing was non applicable to their concern or that it was administratively too difficult to implement. Finally, but 2 percent of respondents who do not currently perform drug screening said they had plans to incorporate it in the future.
Many of the reasons cited higher up for not conducting drug testing chronicle to cost. Organizations may be hesitant to implement drug screening because they view it as a voluntary measure that negatively affects the bottom line. However, this kind of thinking is flawed. Although drug screening does entail an up-forepart investment, the costs or risks of not doing drug screening can be substantial by comparison.
Comparison the Costs and Benefits of Drug Testing
According to the SHRM poll results, for 39 percent of respondents, drug testing costs less than $30 per test per person. Some other 24 percent of employers reported a toll of $31 to $40, while xix percent of employers said they pay between $41 and $l per examination. Simply a slim margin of respondents pays more $50 for each drug test.
The common risks for employers who do not leverage drug testing include college turnover, decreased productivity, increased absenteeism and a greater number of workers' bounty claims. Below we'll highlight each of these principal risks and talk over the related costs to the employer and how drug testing can help mitigate each hazard.
Run a risk # i: Worker Turnover
Substance abuse among workers can increase employee turnover. According to a 2007 written report by Substance Abuse and Mental Wellness Services Assistants, substance abusers alter jobs every bit often every bit three times annually.
Organizations with a high worker turnover will cease up spending more on recruiting, hiring and training, every bit they continually replace workers. Data from the SHRM poll shows that organizations that implemented drug testing saw about a 16 percent decrease in employee turnover rates.
Risk # 2: Productivity
It is no surprise that substance abuse decreases worker productivity. It could cost an system thousands of wasted dollars each payroll to fully compensate workers who are not operating at expected capacity.
In fact, according to Working Partners, National Conference Proceedings Written report sponsored by the U.South. Department of Labor (DOL), Small Business Association (SBA) and Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), has shown that substance abusers are 33 percent less productive than their peers. According to the SHRM poll, of the organizations that began drug testing, 19 percentage experienced an uptick in worker productivity.
Hazard # three: Absence
Substance abusers are as well more likely to be absent-minded from work. A high charge per unit of absenteeism costs employers more money paid for ill days and leaves employers with less overall output. According to the Working Partners, National Conference Proceedings Written report, substance abusers are 2.5 times more likely to exist absent for more than eight days a twelvemonth than regular workers.
The SHRM poll shows that a drug testing program can lower absence. For those organizations with absence rates greater than fifteen%, implementing drug testing reduced absenteeism by near fifty% overall.
Risk # iv: Worker's Compensation Claims
Substance abuse in the workplace may also lead to accidents and injuries, which results in plush workers' compensation claims. Statistics from the U.S. Department of Health and Homo Services, National Plant on Drug Abuse testify that substance abusers every bit much every bit double the cost of worker's bounty claims for their employers.
Again, the SHRM poll respondents who had a high charge per unit of workers' compensation incidences saw an average decrease in workers' compensation claims of 50 pct, after implementing drug testing.
Every bit you lot can see from this price and benefit analysis, the costs associated with not performing drug testing are far greater than the costs of implementing drug testing. In that location is a traceable ROI for drug testing in the form of decreased turnover, absence and worker'southward compensation claims and increased productivity.
Learn the employment drug testing all-time practices of your peers by downloading:
HireRight Employment Screening Benchmarking Report
Download Now
Comments
Source: https://www.hireright.com/blog/2012/02/think-the-cost-of-pre-employment-drug-testing-is-too-high-think-again/#:~:text=Comparing%20the%20Costs%20and%20Benefits,%2441%20and%20%2450%20per%20test.
Posted by: samonscancest.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Much Money Do People Pay For Drug Testing"
Post a Comment